Omar Of Tiberias On Accomplishment Of A Doubtful Thing

The translation of a fragment from the book by the astrologer of VIII c. Omar of Tiberias (‘Umar Ibn al-Farrukhân al-Tabarî) on horaries. This fragment says about accomplishment of some doubtful thing. The way of judgement doesn’t look standard for modern horary astrology.

Omar said: whether a doubtful thing will be accomplished?

Look at the lord of Mid-Heaven, and if it will be in any angle and not combusted, say that this thing will be on the same day. And if it will be in 3rd house, or 6th, or 12th, it is already completed. But if will not be in any of these places, then look at the degrees from the lord of the hour to the lord of Ascendant, to which add the degree of Mid-Heaven, and begin from the first degree of Mid-Heaven, and where the number will be complete, there will be the Lot of Doubtful Thing. Then look if the lord of that lot or that lot beholds the lord of Ascendant by an aspect of trine or sextile, then say this thing will be, if from the other hand – not. Moreover, if you want to know, when the thing will be, look how many degrees are between the lord of Ascendant and Ascendant, and give a month for every two and half degrees. Or otherwise, if the lord of Mid-Heaven will be in an angle, or in the 3th house, or 6th, or 12th, then see the degrees between itself [lord of Mid-Heaven?] and the lord of the hour, to which add the degree of Ascendant, and begin from the Ascendant, and where the number will be complete, there will be the Lot of Doubtful Thing. Also, if the lord of Mid-heaven will be out of these places, you will take a distance from the lord of the hour upto the lord of Mid-Heaven, and where the number will be complete, there will be the lot. Then look among the Ascendent, and the Sun, and the Moon, if they are strong in the asked, put the degrees, which are from the lord of Acdendent to the Ascendant, a day for every degree. If they are weak, put a month for every degree; if they are badly placed, then put a year for every degree.


Share or Bookmark This...

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • Blogosphere News
  • blogtercimlap
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Fark
  • Simpy
  • MSN Reporter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

No related posts.

Tags: , , ,

  1. Then look if the lord of that lot or that lot beholds the lord of Ascendant by an aspect of trine or sextile, then say this thing will be, if from the other hand – not.
    ____________________________________

    Hi,

    “if from the other hand – not” – does it mean – from square or opposition? I do not quite understand “from the other hand”…

    Cheers,
    D

    Reply

  2. Hi,

    It rather means “otherwise”, “else”, I think. I.e. if it doesn’t behold the lord of Ascendant by trine or sextile, then – not.
    I just tried to follow the Latin text as close as I can :)

    Anton

    Reply

  3. Umar always ends up sounding like Dorotheus, especially in his work on nativities, although this passage is a bit unusual.

    Reply

    1. There are several unusual (i.e. different from well-known today Lilly style horary) horary techniques in Arabian horary astrology, actually. For example, there is unusual way of finding a significator of querent. Abenragel (Abû l-Hasan ‘Alî ibn Abî l-Rijâl) mentions the following method in his Preclarissimus liber completus in judiciis astrorum (ascribing it to al-Kindi):

      “The significator of querent is the planet that has many dignities in 5 hylech, which are the Sun and the Moon, the Ascendant, the Part of Fortune, and the place of the conjunction or opposition preceding the question. Dignities are by this way: the lord of domicile has 5 dignities, the lord of exaltation – 4, the lord of terms – 3, the lord of triplicity – 2, the lord of face – 1″.

      It looks like an almuten of a natal chart, but it really was in use in horary and horary-like astrology. For example, in the beginning of XVI century such celebrated astrologer as Johannes Virdung of Hasfurt used this way of finding significator in the charts of observing of urine. He finds in such a chart the significator (he calls it almuten) exactly the same way as described in Abenragel. Then, the planet afflicting this significator shows the nature of the disease; the domicile of the significator which the significator better observes shows the cause of the disease, and the house where the significator is placed shows the place of the disease in the body.

      Reply